Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

Sunday, 7 February 2016

The Book Thief

I found a post buried within the notes of my Iphone, so almost three years later, here it is! (I hope I'm a bit better at writing now)

I'd almost go as far as saying that this was among my best films of the year so far. Twelve years a slave was certainly up there and Book Thief makes it too.

welldidyouevah.wordpress.com
The film has the kind of soundtrack you would want to buy and listen to all day long. It was emotive and reflective and set the tone well. That, combined with the beatified innocence of Liesel and Rudy with their bright eyes and flawless skin made it so you could not look away. You could see into their souls through their eyes and were drawn into wishing some good luck would come their way. Director Brian Percival couldn't have cast more beautiful children. 

The Book Thief follows Liesel as her communist mother gives her up to a German family, to keep her safe and to ultimately give her a good life. This rapidly follows the death of her younger brother which begins a trend of loss that Liesel becomes quite accustomed to. On her arrival to the area, schoolboy Rudy takes a liking to her and she to him, and they quickly become good friends. 

mercurynews.com
It isn't long however, before someone arrives to stand in the way of that - a Jew. Liesel's new papa takes him in, indebted to Max's father and the dangerous secrets begin. There really are beautiful moments within the plot. For example, as Max cannot go outside for fear of being discovered by the Germans, Liesel describes the days to him as she learns new words from her books. One day it snows, and she brings in buckets full for him to feel. Her Papa soon joins in the fun shortly followed by our stern tempered, hard faced mama. It is a wonder to behold. A warmth amidst a film that is ultimately quite soul destroying. 

historyextra.com
Then follows air raids, conscription, death and illness. The only light Liesel has in her life is her friend Rudy, whom she distances herself from in order to keep her secret, and her books. The books that she reads at the Mayor's house when she delivers his wife's ironing are another escape for her, at a time when books are threatened by the Nazi regime. The relationship that unfolds between these two women is charming. The mayor's wife, Ilsa Hermann explains that she lost her own child when he was young and Liesel somehow aids her mourning, through the love she finds for life in her books and in sharing them. 

daniellereviewsmovingpictures.wordpress.com
When the commandant finds out he forbids it to carry on and so, Liesel's salvation lies in tatters, or does it. The title of the film lends itself to the solution and Liesel begins to steal books when Max falls ill from the cold of the snow she's brought in. It seems that happiness throughout is almost immediately destroyed by devastation. Nevertheless she is convinced that reading to him will keep him alive. But stealing books from the commandant has it's risks, luckily it was only Rudy, equally as innocent, that discovers her secret. We see some real devotion among children that truly reminded me of why I sometimes have belief in humanity. As he takes a beating and jumps into the river to retrieve a book, Rudy shows just how powerful a childhood friendship can be - although perhaps he wants a little more than friendship.

The set, the costume, the casting, the music - all brilliant. The script, also brilliant. It can at times appear sentimental but that is not a flaw by any means, it simply means that by the end, we are left more devastated.

deadshirt.net
I have to applaud the ability of our two young leads in particular. They lit up the screen, and their friendship was completely believable. I can imagine them both running around set together in between takes. It's the kind of thing I remember adoring between father and children in Chitty Chitty bang bang. It's quite hard to have such onscreen integrity but with a heavy script that offered a very astute and adult voice to the young - they aced it. There was similar relationship between Liesel and Hans Hubermann, her new 'papa'. He is softer than his wife and they share moments of light-hearted jest at her expense, bring them closer together in a time of great unhappiness.

whatsontv.co.uk
All in all, on leaving the cinema I felt holistic content. As much as the plot destroyed all of the characters we so wanted to live happily ever after, the fact that it didn't give in to that, and instead stayed true to the book and provenance of the era, made it all the more special. It was nice to see a story more focussed on the relationships of the characters than on the events going on around them - as is so often portrayed in modern film. After all, in war, it is these relationships that decide our fate, more often than not. We will Liesel to go on learning, to go on reading and ultimately ensure that the fascist society she hates, educates itself against prejudice and war. When that final moment comes and Max walks in to greet her, we breathe a sigh of relief, that Liesel might finally have found someone that refuses to die, as everyone she has loved falls short of survival. Her passion for finding happiness and hope in everything is something we all wish we had more often.

I'm so glad I saw 'The Book Thief'. It makes a nice change from thrillers and superhero action films. If you want a film to help you reevaluate your life, or send sparks to your spirit then definitely make the effort! Some child actors with a very, very bright future ahead I think. It'll also be a nice one to cuddle up on the sofa and get a bit teary when it comes out on DVD!

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Born Naughty

'Born Naughty' seemed just the kind of easy-watch television I was looking for. That was until I started watching. Either the edit selection was shoddy, or the director had no idea what they were looking for, as shots were all similarly awkward. The main coverage was as expected but wherever there was an edit to cover, only aided by voiceover, the shots showed awkward contributors leaving their houses and harsh sound quality differences in ill-fitting flashbacks.

dailymail,co.uk
The voiceover script was great at pointing out the obvious and at times, was a little assuming and cringeworthy. I'm not sure if it was the delivery or the script itself, but either way, lines such as, 'the family, who are now hungry for answers' after an intro about poor Bobby's life-affecting eating habits, just didn't work with the tone of the series. It was supposed to be an investigative medical format in which the aim was to help the families, not laugh at them. More than once were these quite serious issues put down to poor parenting and to mum being called lazy by grandma, and there really is no need to put that comment on every title sequence! The series so far has not captured the medical responsibility at all, nor the doctor/patient understanding. It's more of an 'us' and 'them' feel, gathering evidence in family homes and keeping their findings from them until the big reveal, pinning all their hopes on one moment. Professionalism and sensitivity, if there was any, were not reflected in the edit, jazzing it up with flashbacks and poor audio mixing, and I found it distracting.

radiotimes.com
In episode 2 it wasn't just poor edit selection either, we were being told one thing and shown another. We could pick holes in our 'experts' opinions because we had been present at times when those traits had not appeared on camera. Like when Jessi-Jai, a young girl with speech problems was miraculously saved by losing her dummy. On first visit, when Dr Ravi met her, she was sociable and imaginative, even sharing eye contact. On the second visit she instead did things her way, avoiding interaction. From minute to minute we as an audience were being pulled through a non-existent, inconsistent narrative of edited codswallop, that could potentially even be quite damaging to both contributors and viewers. Parents have the carrot of a cure dangled in front of them for the whole production, only to have their dreams realised, or destroyed right at the end. It's just not ok, I could barely watch. The children themselves were the redeeming ingredient in this horrible mix of opinions and experiments.

Completely insensitive, poorly scripted and inconsistent. Come on Maverick, you can do better than that.

Sunday, 22 February 2015

'Born in Gaza'

This week, I spent my Friday evening among NGO representatives, documentary-goers, journalists and truth-seekers at the Frontline Club, for the UK premiere of Hernan Zin's beautifully filmed, 'Born in Gaza'.

The film follows 10 children between the ages of 6 and 13 as they recall the impact that the war in Gaza has had on their childhood and the price that the ordinary people have had to pay for a war where they are constantly asking themselves, 'why, why me?'.

www.elimparcial.es
I'll start with the cinematography. In a world where news reels show us unsteady mobile phone footage and blurred images of people fleeing an event, Zin wanted to give the audience time to understand his subjects, by slowing everything right down. The result was somewhat beautiful, as we watch our children of Gaza go about their daily tasks, we have the time to study them, to work out their thoughts from visuals before we hear them explained. The slow motion captures are unique amidst a backdrop of war and conflict and yet it speaks just as loud as any comment does, when we are able to study their every emotion, and have the time to conclude for ourselves just how much pain lies behind those eyes. It's tragically authentic.

Then I have to mention the drone. How Zin got a drone into Gaza I'm still not sure, but he did. And the aerial shots are the first images from the region that I've seen that really show the scale of the destruction, as well as how large the region of Gaza actually is. He also had some really lovely shots of Mohamed swimming underwater, so again, I'm not sure how he managed to get so much equipment into the region in the first place but I am so glad that he did. The cinematography was fantastic, especially considering the short amount of time that Zin spent there getting it right. His first visit, was cut from 5 days to just 1, so it's remarkable he got any footage at all.

decine21.com
Next, I'll speak about the story. It did lack a little in narrative but I feel that that's due to the rushed nature of putting the whole thing together. It was merely an editing together of separate stories and jumping through them, rather than instilling a narrative between them. The narrative was almost the destruction, shown through the wonderful drone shots I mentioned above. In Zin's words, 'We didn't even edit, just the questions and answers, they are incredible'. I seem to remember Zin telling us that the whole film was pieced together and edited in just 3 weeks? He wanted to get the film out whilst the message was still strong, and succeeded I think, in that. Despite the lack of narrative, it did not take away from the compelling nature of the children, and the way they told their stories. They have endured a constant barrage of fear and now, finally, with a middle finger held up to the bias of mass media corporations, we as an audience are allowed in to see it.

theguardian.com
In 2013 I travelled to Israel, and whilst my friends were content with learning about the conflict from the Israeli side, with input from Toby Greene of Bicom, who gave us a run down of the political history of the region, I really wanted to see for myself what life in the West Bank or Gaza is really like. During the session with Toby, although he allowed us to come to our own conclusions, the history of the state always came back to the plight of the Israelis... never to the plight of the Palestinians. THAT is the reason I attended the screening, because I wanted to see 'beyond the lines' if you like. Hernan Zin's film allowed me to do just that. I wanted to hear more about the fact that 'Palestine has for six decades, been denied the right to become a state' Hernan Zin.

Hamada - cultura.elpais.com
Motasem & his father - feelmakers.com
There were no politics involved in the film, no adult intervention - just children - and with it, the remarkable absence of hate and revenge as well as the complete removal of 'blame' - after all, the word Israel is only mentioned once. These children speak with such clarity of conscience about their innocence, their needs and their hopes, or absence of, for the future. The two children that touched me the most, were Hamada and his cousin Motasem; two of the surviving boys from the aerial attack on the boys playing football on the beach. 13yr old Hamada has such an intelligent and mature outlook on his life that he blew me away. He knows that they are innocent in the war, he knows that his cousin has been affected deeply by it and he knows that he needs help. Motasem, is 11 years old, and suffers from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Just two days before Zin returned to film, Motasem shares with him that he tried to kill himself. He was going to jump from a building and his relative stopped him - Is this what this war is all about, crushing the will of children? You can see the fear and the pain etched into his face. Just as you can feel the children on edge as they tell of how they would jump at the sound of doors slamming. The film brings with it a 'feeling' rather than just a 'commentary' and that I feel, is unique.

blogs.elpais.com
I also thought it was remarkable that 6yr old Bisan, a young girl who refuses to talk about an attack that left her unable to close her right eye, has a young friend who is able to explain this to us, in a way that we could never have dreamt of communicating when we were her age. It is perhaps comforting to know, that her injuries are now going to be treated and operated on in Madrid, with the help of the film-makers, so perhaps Bisan will be able to at least draw a line under her external pain, if not the internal. However, the permission to travel must at first be granted by the Israeli authorities of course.

Hernan Zin with Mohamed - twitter.com

There are a wealth of moments that I could speak about, but the children of the film itself provide more justice than I could ever do with my words. They create a portrait of pain and of need for psychological support. They show that they are resilient: Mohamed, is just a boy and the only bread-winner in his family. He works all day collecting plastics with his horse and cart, for just 5 shekels - the equivalent of 80 pence.


It may not be the perfect film in terms of narrative, but from what I got from Zin, his only objective was to voice the suffering of the children... and in that he succeeded beautifully. The film is a wonderfully authentic portrait of childhood in Gaza and a powerful plea for psychological therapy, and an end to the conflict. After all, how can a child grow up when everyday he wakes to the sound of Israeli drones and the sight of Israeli warships 5miles to the horizon? He can't. And 'Born in Gaza' gives a particularly emotive voice to the people who endure this every day.
Here's the trailer:


BORN IN GAZA_official trailer from CONTRAMEDIA FILMS on Vimeo.

Thursday, 19 February 2015

Nowhere to Call Home Q&A

Monday 16th February 2015
Frontline Club Screening
Nowhere to Call Home - Q&A with Director Jocelyn Ford
http://www.frontlineclub.com/

tibetaninbeijing.com
Jocelyn: thank you all for watching and before we start with questions I just want to thank a few people. My editor is here. She took the first pile of material and said oh gosh, I’ll get you something in three months. Anyway, years later, we have a film. Also I believe some Kickstarter donors in here too. I had a lot of support from other colleagues in Beijing, some of whom are here. Mary’s sitting in the back, she went to yoga and every time I had a terrible problem with the film, she was there to listen. So anyway, thank you all very much and if you do have any questions.

Q: It’s really impressive how much access you gained to Zanta and Yang Qing’s everyday life, not only with their families but also their schools, the more institutional areas. I was wondering if you could talk a bit about the different obstacles you faced gaining access, not only in the village but in the city.
As you may have noticed, I have never made a film before and I had no idea how to go about it. But what I was told is that you must have one important thing, and that its trust from the person in your film. And so Zanta gave me that trust within 20mins of our conversation unbeknownst to me, for years. That she thought because I sat down and talked to her that we had this connection in a past life. And I honestly did not know that for many years after I started working with her, and started the film. But with other people in Beijing it’s a lawless sort of place so, I would show up at the police station and they would have to figure out what to do with me. They could have shooed me away, they could have told me I couldn’t do this but I don’t know if you noticed when she goes to get back her items at the police station, the authority never looked at me once. He brought her into the back room and said ‘who is that woman’, she said ‘it’s a reporter’ and then he came out, and I think he did a performance. He wanted to show that he was being fair, because when he didn’t establish eye contact with me once, he pretended I wasn’t there and when we exited the police station a bunch of Han Chinese street vendors pleaded with us to go back in and represent them because they were going to be charged a fine to get back their items. So, that’s just one story. I was just there and I did what I thought I should do.

Q: Once the police knew you were a reporter, was it a concern for them who you were a reporter for? Who you were reporting to?
So, as many of you in this room know, in Beijing you’re required to register as a reporter and so the police would come and look at my card and call up their colleagues and I’d have to write down all my details. So they knew who I was with but I don’t know if that made a difference.

filmplatform.net
Q: Was this is Chinese Tibet, rather than TAR, did you have any feelings of things out there?
Thank you very much for that question. Often times in screenings I like to point out that Tibet is a huge area, the size of Western Europe and there are many different cultural groups within it, many different languages, perhaps 50. When is started the film someone told me there were 25 different languages, now I’m told there are 50.Not a lot is known about it because there are a lot of restrictions on journalists or outsiders going into the area.
This was actually filmed in Sichuan. There are more Tibetans living outside the Tibetan Autonomous Region than there are living inside of it and that is also I think, not very well known. There are several provinces with a lot of Tibetan communities so when I went to her local area – and according to official rules, journalists are supposed to be able to travel there without impediments or without registering in advance, to the Tibetan areas outside of the TAR. You need special permission to go to the Autonomous region. That’s often not upheld as many of you know, but that was the official rule and this was in 2009 and the Olympics had just come along. I spoke to the local police, who did call me into the police station and said well the rules say ‘I’m allowed to be here’ and they said ‘yes, we know that. You’re here for a family visit so, be good’.

Q: Firstly that was brilliant thank you so much, I really enjoyed it. You said this was in 2009 so, 6yrs later, are you in regular contact with Zanta?
Yes, Zanta just sent me a few WeChat voice messages. She’s in her village for new years as we speak. There was a big religious ceremony there today and she and her son went back. This is the second time that her son has gone back since that agreement which both sides broke. When he was younger she was very reluctant to allow him to go back because she thought she might never see him again. He might not be allowed to come back to education. But he’s now 14 and he can take care of himself.

facebook.com
Q: And how’s he doing, is he doing well at school?
His English is excellent, his math, (gestures ‘not so much’). He’s had a lot of difficulties in school. The teacher has been very unwelcoming towards Tibetans and has told other children not to associate with him and I think, she’s trying to force him out. But I should say that he’s now in a public school and has been there for about three years and you do not see that school in this film.
So it’s not been easy but last week I believe, maybe a bout ten days ago he actually asks his grandfather if he could have his ID because he would like the study in the United States.
So this is very much in play. Apparently the last message I received is that the grandfather, Aba, had agreed. And said, ‘I wouldn’t give it to you if it was that lousy foreigner who wanted you to go but if it’s you who really wants to go, let’s go’.

Q: And how would they afford it?
There’s a little bit of a back-story. When I screened, did the premiere in the US at the Museum of Modern art, I got a phone call from somebody who says, ‘hi’ – perfect American accent – ‘I’m in Queens, and Aba is my relative’. Yeh, no way! He said ‘yeh, we want to go see the film’. I said, ‘well I’m sorry it’s sold out but I’d like to meet with you’. And so I went to their house and the person who called me was the 25yr old son of Aba’s cousin I believe, or something like that. And so, his dad grew up with Aba and they left, the 25yr old, left the country aged 10, walked to India and somehow they got their family – and almost died on the way, aged 10. Somehow the family got to the US, I haven’t heard the whole story and seven years ago, the 25yr old man managed to get from India to the US where he is now a marketing manager for Horizon.

facebook.com
Yeh, wonderful kid and I mean, I was so impressed with him I said ‘wow, I want what he’s having’. His English was great, he understood American ways of thinking about things and knew something about his village but was quite shocked when he actually watched the film. He had no idea what life was like.

So, then they said, ‘what are you going to do about the kid’s schooling’ and I said, ‘they are not a lot of great choices out there’. So he said, ‘why don’t you have him come to the US’ and I said, ‘he doesn’t have his ID’ and the 25yr old’s dad said, ‘actually, I visited my village a few years ago, I’m the one who convinced Aba that education is good and that he should allow his son to continue studying in Beijing’. He said, ‘I can get that ID’.

It’s a long story, I won’t go through all of it but needless to say, Aba was not very happy with all this. There were a lot of negative messages going to Zanta but the guy in the US was saying everything’s fine. Anyway, it might be cool, it might be fine and if so, I will probably be looking for a home stay family for Yang Qing because the neighborhood that his cousin, or whatever the relationship is, lives in, is not that great and he’s quite busy and I wouldn’t want, I don’t think Zanta wants him in the city wandering around.  So then he went and had all these ideas about America. 

Q: How far back does this prejudice against Tibetans go?
First of all I’d like to say it’s quite mutual. From what I can gather. Are there any Tibetans in the audience? Are you interested in answering?

Audience: Well I mean obviously the invasion in 59, I guess it predates that really.

So the words that are used in Mandarin, tend to be ‘barbarian’, not very complementary. Going back way back in history. Anybody who was not Han Chinese - and what is Han is a whole other debate we’re not getting into tonight - was considered to be inferior in terms of culture. So I think that’s a deep-seeded sort of feeling.

When I do these screenings in China, I often bring up one of the Tibetan saying which I don’t know if you know, there are a couple in her village that go like, ‘there are as many good-hearted Han Chinese as there are white crows’. And I don’t know how old this is but I think it goes back pretty far. So I think there’s a lot of work to be done to build mutual respect.

 Q: When did you decide to do the film?
I didn’t actually decide to do it, my producer decided I should do it. I have a producer, who is also a filmmaker and a jack of many trades, who basically twisted my arm into making this. I was his idea.
facebook.com
I had done, just before the Olympics, technology was changing and cameras were coming out that were small enough and cheap enough that I could afford them. And I thought oh let me play around with them so I did a series of five videos for a newspaper on the Olympics and one of them I brought Zanta and Yang Qing to a field hockey game. They’d of course never heard of field hockey, hadn’t heard of any of the countries that were playing or anything but I swear they were the happiest people in the entire audience. Yang Qing wore a western suit, Zanta put on her best Tibetan clothes and they had a wonderful time.

So he saw this video and a bunch of old street journal colleagues watched it and said ‘my god, this in 3mins encapsulates so much more than you could ever say in print. You must do a documentary’.
So, I said ‘no, I have no idea how to go about doing it’ and I considered myself a professional so I wasn’t going to do something I didn’t know how to do and my producer said, ‘oh I’ll give you everything, a cameraman, you don’t have to raise money’ and I was like, well how can I turn that down. Of course, then he got busy and the money ran out and I had to do all these things I didn’t intend to but essentially he got the ball rolling.

facebook.com
Q: So you had to do the filming in the village, but the filming in Beijing, you had a cameraman?
On two or three of those occasions I had one but most of it I actually ended up doing myself, as you can probably tell. I had no training. The cameraman was supposed to go with me to her village and I was off in Acha (China) doing a story on the tsunami anniversary, and I got this phone call saying, ‘sorry, I have a paying job, I can’t go with you. You’re on your own’. So I arrived back in Beijing in the morning, picked up a camera I didn’t know how to use, asked, ‘what could possibly go wrong’ and headed off. And yes, the camera did stop working while I was there but we managed, I had a backup.

Q: Thanks it was really great. Can you give us some examples of reactions you’ve seen so far, both on the Tibetan side and Chinese side? How has it been received?
I’ve had both but I must say I’m very pleased that I’ve had more positive reactions than negative, on both sides. A lot of Han Chinese are totally shocked because the media says ‘we treat Tibetans so well, we give them all this money, what are they complaining about?’, there really is a lot of Han Chinese that do not understand where this animosity comes from. ‘Why don’t they appreciate what we do?’ – I consider this very media driven. So when they see the film, they have to come to grips with the difference between what they thought before and what they see here. Because Zanta is amazingly frank, she’s incredible, and because they don’t see this as a propaganda film. 

facebook.com
So, a lot of times I’ve been really pleased with the younger, especially the high school kids, the Han Chinese high school kids in Beijing. A lot have said, ‘Well gosh, we see there’s a problem, what do we do about it? Who should be responsible, is this something the government can fix? Can I as an individual do anything?’ I’ve had an outpouring of people actually volunteering to help Yang Qing with his studies, or help Zanta with her jewelry sales and I must say I’ve had more volunteers among Han Chinese than any other group, if you’re going to talk about that, whether it be Westerners or Tibetans. So, I’m encouraged by that.

I had the privilege of doing a screening one day in the same afternoon, both for the Chinese academy for social science ethnologists, some of them who are advising the government, and then the high school kids. The ethnologists, some would come up and say, ‘oh you must have missed our policy that we send all migrant children to school’ or something like this and I was like, ‘no, what happens on paper doesn’t really happen like that in reality’. So I had some comments that ran along for 5-10 minutes, from Tibetans and Han Chinese where they’re not quite sure what they’re trying to say but I get the feeling they’re very uncomfortable. And sometimes it’s like ‘our policy is not like this’. On the Tibetan side I’ve had young Tibetan, men have come up to me and said, ‘thank you so much for making this film’ and one said it reflects his mother’s experience but she’s not in a position to talk about it or have it heard. And some have said, ‘you can’t make this film because you’re supporting the Beijing government’s propaganda that we’re less developed, that we’re a backwards society’ or ‘you’re distracting attention from what is really important to us, or to those people who are making these comments which are the bigger political issues’. 

And after long conversations with people who disagree often times I find that they often rethink things so, if that’s helpful…

Q: did you have to get permission to show this in Beijing, and the reason I ask is thinking of the theme there, of two warring clans, that is often the propaganda you get from the Chinese government about  why they invaded Tibet otherwise they would have destroyed themselves  through civil war. In some sense that theme comes back.
As a foreign correspondent we don’t need to get permission. So, if you think this could really get permission from the state apparatus I’d be, I’d love to know your connections. I know that on Chinese producer, after seeing the film was so excited he actually went to the state TV, CCTV, much to my surprise and they said well, if I’d been a Chinese person getting involved it would be a great film, but I’m not so no thank you. They saw it as Western propaganda. I find when I speak with people who have a  political stance, often times the Americans will say, ‘oh my gosh the Chinese are going to use this as propaganda’ and the Chinese will say, ‘oh my gosh the Americans are going to use this as propaganda’ so I feel like I’ve probably got it about right.

Q: Thank you very much, your film was very different from other documentaries that have been made about Tibet, which was really interesting. A couple of things, when Zanta was first talking she said there were 1000 Tibetans in Beijing and I don’t know if you’re still there but I was wondering if there’s a bigger influx now and how the racial the aspect is changing, if at all, within the city?
contented.cc
And just in regard to all the self-immolation that’s been happening, whether there’s a kind of stir within the city, and within the Tibetan community within Beijing?
Well I’m hoping that by showing the film and talking about racism and prejudice and by bringing in documentary films from other countries that deal with these issues, that we can raise the issue. Because unfortunately I must say I haven’t noticed any awareness, racism and prejudice are things that happen in the United States, not there. People I show it to in China say, ‘oh no, it doesn’t happen here’. They’re just unaware. There are about 100 [Tibetans] from her [Zanta’s] community. Basically, after the Olympics, almost everybody, all young people came out. And some of them have now gone to other cities to sell at trade fairs and stuff like that, but there are very few people left, young people, left in their village.

They, to the best of my knowledge, the self-immolations are not foremost in their minds. I think that surviving, and economic survival is at this point, what’s of most concern to most of the people in her community.

facebook.com
Q: I was curious. It says her husband was from a neighboring village, but then you see in the film that it’s actually a long way away. I just wondered how they’d met.
Yeh, it says next door, in their context that’s not that far. Actually they were picking the grass worms used for Chinese medicine in Qinghai, I believe when they met. So they were in yet another location. She left, when she first left to do this, she was about 14 and they got chased across the plains by the locals in Qinghai, the local Tibetans and she was quite afraid for her life because they had guns and they had two days til they could get to a town. So she’s had quite a lot of drama in her life.

Q: Thank you I thought it was an absolutely fantastic film. You said at the beginning, you were very candid through the whole film, that you didn’t know what you were getting yourself into and it became very clear as things were going on that circumstances were changing and consequences were unknown. I was originally going to ask the question…the story so far seems to have had a happy ending, would you have, if you went back to the beginning, would you still go ahead with the film? I suspect you might say yes to that. So, my question is more, were someone in a similar circumstance to you when Zanta first approached you, would you advise them to follow the same path, would you advise them to get involved and if so, what advice would you give them, about exercising caution, about how to interact?
facebook.com
So Yang Qing is not the first child I’ve sent to school, I think I have sucker written on my forehead somewhere. I guess that many of you have worked in the field and been approached by people like this and personally have decided that, if I’m capable, if it’s within my means to help somebody and it doesn’t cause me too much disruption then I would do it. Now, this caused much more disruption than I was up for but I think, I’d still do that, if someone is in need and they approach me. I mean I’m not going to go out , I’m not an NGO, I’m not a bank, despite what some people may think, but if it’s something I can help somebody figure out. I mean they also have to invest in it.

I mean when I first found him a school I first suggested to Zanta that she call an NGO and see if they could provide something. Well, she did that and they said sorry we can’t do anything for you. And then, I said ‘is there a migrant school in your neighborhood’. She said yes and she went, and this was on a Sunday and the next morning at about 7am she called me and said ‘I’m at the school, it’s fine, let’s enroll’. So by noon the child was enrolled and I asked her to pay 100, or 200 Renminbi (about £20) for the semester, just to make sure that she was invested in it. So, the approach that I’ve taken is…


Q: It was more, certain actions you took to try and help, it didn’t seem at all certain that it would have helped, I mean it did in the end for example, taking the legal document to Aba, did you not think that could have gone horribly wrong or even going along with Zanta to police stations and to her village, did you ever think my involvement in this situation could have… I suppose my question is, if people find themselves in this situation, wanting to help, wanting to do something, wanting to get involved but are scared of entering this alien environment, would you advise them to proceed with that and if so, what advice would you give?
facebook.com
Yes I’d rather not be asked for advice but I must say that even today, I don’t know if what we have done, or what we’re doing here or even my very words, could have a negative impact. I consider her a risk-taker. She offered to give her child to a complete stranger, I mean how risky, how much riskier can you get? And I consider myself a calculated risk-taker. So we try to be informed and I’ve asked her on many occasions, you know, my involvement has also created a lot of jealousy in her community and given her a lot of grief. Is it worth it to you? 

I mean on many steps along the way I tell her what I think the stakes are and I tell her I don’t now what the impact will be. And she’s always decided to go forward. 

Having said that, she is planning to leave – she just arrived in her village because they had this special religious ceremony, but she’s planning to leave tomorrow – and she doesn’t know if she’s going back. And I don’t really know what’s happening as we speak. She did tell me she wasn’t going to take photographs because a woman shouldn’t be seen holding a camera in her village. I don’t know what other pressures she may be under and I know that she won’t tell me as long as she’s there. So, I’ll just have to wait until tomorrow or a few days from now and hope that she can, she will tell me.

Q: How did they respond to you and how did the respond to the camera? You had some amazing shots and I just wonder what their initial reaction was.
facebook.com
Zanta to me is exactly the same on and off camera, it doesn’t seem to impact her at all. But when she came back and she translated things, sometimes they would say ‘oh Jocelyn’s ready now, ohhh Jocelyn’s running the camera now, we’re in the kitchen you better look your best’ or something like that. So in general I thought there was not really much of a reaction and I think that because they grew up in an era without mass media and are not necessarily aware of the power of story and the power of film, it was very difficult for me to try to explain to them what was happening- because Zanta would always say – or what I thought the impact of the story might be.
facebook.com


But Zanta would always say, ‘who’d be interested in me, no-one’s ever paid any interest in me whatsoever, they’ve just walked all over me’ I mean she has no status, so for years she would say that. And now I think she’s finally beginning to understand because she’s seen the reaction and she’s come to a few Q&As and she’s seen that people like to buy her jewelry a lot. So it’s been a long process in trying to explain that.



Q: My question is about the filming, I mean you just went there with the camera, not exactly Hollywood stuff, and I think you had just a one time chance to be in the village. Did you feel yourself afterwards, missing something from the record, or did you just record everything?
So I’m a glutton for information, I tend to over-record. Gigi [editor] will tell you. I asked her so many times how many hours of footage, she still hasn’t told me.

Gigi: Too many!

Too many, that’s the answer. Was anything missing?

Gigi: Quite a lot of good stuff but the essence was all there, you can’t have everything in the film.

Yeh I mean it’s a lot. I could make several other films, I have enough material for several other films. Gigi may be moving onto bigger and better things. I’m planning on making small clips, not large, long films but maybe if I could do a curriculum or an online – for either a Chinese audience or international audiences – put together issue-based footage. I could do three minute or five minute clips, that could really get into some of the issues and then have some text to go along with it I think that would be a great thing to do, if I can find people who’re interested.

I have raised the possibility of doing ‘tolerance, anti-racism training’ shall we say, in China, for teachers, for other people who might be interested. I have a couple of people, anthropologists who are interested in collaborating on something. We have yet to figure this out. But I think if I could do that then some of the material might be re-worked and useful in that context.

facebook.com
Q: When I was there, which was before the uprising in 2008, Tibet was incredibly fashionable amongst educated Beijing-ers. They were all going either to become Buddhist or to go to nightclubs. I’m just wondering when you showed this film to people in Beijing, for some of the more philosophical aspects… because so many people in Beijing are challenging some of the materialism, there’s such a huge growth in religion and all sorts. Do people actually engage with it at that level?
In one way or another. The first screening I did for a Chinese audience, people who I didn’t know. What seemed to upset some of them most, they didn’t tell me, I had a Chinese friend come with me to help with the screening. They all came down to her and said, ‘oh my god, that is so untrue’, they felt incredibly hurt by the comment that Han Chinese seemed to respect all the wealth and not respect the poor, that really disturbed them.

And yet you see it in Chinese media or Chinese online discussions all the time. So I think that has hit a chord with some.  Is that sort of what you mean?

Q: After 2008, that whole fascist Buddhism crash…so hang on a minute this Buddhism is really rather a sham because they believe in violence and so that whole interest in Buddhism was fundamentally shaken. Not that people thought that the alternative materialism was fantastic, but there was significant change in the amount of interest.
Actually, that’s not been my experience at all and it’s been quite the opposite. I was recently in a small village and I asked a young kid where he would like to travel most, he probably was a junior college graduate or something, and he said Tibet. I mean Tibet among young people is incredibly hot, I would say today. It’s exoticised and people are looking for the spiritual. So I mean it’s not been my experience but then I only know anecdotal tales.

It was large, an amount of business people who had invested a lot in Buddhism, in going there and building relationships…
I’m not aware of that level, but I am aware that a lot of the people who are trying to help Zanta with her business, also have an interest in Buddhism but I don’t have numbers.

tibetaninbeijing.com
Remember to check out the Frontline Club Screenings here: http://www.frontlineclub.com/

Wednesday, 11 February 2015

'The Nether' at The Duke of York's Theatre

'The Nether' - the adopted, scarily advanced grandchild of the internet. It can create sensations of touch, of smell, of sight and can even allow humans to 'cross over' into a universe we ourselves play God to. 

thenethertheplay.co.uk

I'm always a little bit dubious to believe reviews that use the words 'riveting' and 'spectacular', but true to its critics, 'The Nether' gave us everything we expected and more - more being the hour long debate me and my partner had following the show. 

theselfishyears.blogspot.com
The atmosphere within the Duke of York’s Theatre procured an essence of Charlie Brooker-esque imagination accommodated by 5 strong performances from our cast. Our actors were supported by some interesting aesthetic projections of a live video feed from a camera on the interrogation desk CS and some effective and well-executed technical transitions between the downstage 'real-world' & upstage 'The Nether'. 

'The Nether' is a play set in 2050, that explores the interrogation of the man behind the creation of a coded reality, 'The Hideaway' - a server hidden in the depths of the future of the internet (the nether), that gives paedophiles of the 'real-world' a place to act upon their urges in a false world, a secondary world. In this world, anyone can enter, so long as they adhere to the rules of 'the nether'. This means, that in 'The Hideaway', those who appear as children, are in fact adults posing as children. So is it immoral - or isn't it? Who are we to deny our escapists the chance to enter another world? Who are we to define what is imagination and what is reality?

I have invited a guest blogger, Kamal Shaddad to pick apart the concept of 'The Nether' and its morality here: http://watchinabitotheatrenstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-nerdy-nether.html whilst my blogpost focuses solely on the production. In doing so, I have to commend the ladies for their performances. Amanda Hale is wonderfully abrupt as our interrogator yet brilliant as our emotionally-broken daughter also. Although, even Hale is marginally overshadowed by the London debut of the young Zoe Brough as Iris.

royalcourttheatre.com
The two older members of the cast had their moments although I felt that Stanley Townsend was perhaps a little stale when compared with his co-stars. David Calder’s performance was as I expected; he gave us diffidence as well as once again attributing a remarkable naivety to his character.

I also enjoyed the performance of Ivanno Jeremiah as Professor Woodnut. He was full of energy, full of likeable physicality traits that lure us too, into the trap of ‘The Hideaway’. The relationship that blossoms between Woodnut and Iris is believable because our cast make it so. It almost feels, dare I say it, REAL.

Jennifer Haley’s script is wonderfully eloquent in both exploring the future, and in identifying and challenging our moral altruism, particularly towards children. She lures us in to the interrogation, into assuming that Morris (Hale) is in the right, and Sims (Stanley) is in the wrong. Yet as the plot unfolds, the blur between right and wrong appears more obvious. Our interrogator herself, may not be so innocent of the 'crimes' committed within 'the hideaway'. Or are they crimes? Is Iris still a child, even though she is merely coded to look as such? Will we one day have to adapt our laws to define in which reality, in which world they exist to rule? Haley boldly throws up every counter-argument in the book before it has even a chance to settle. 'The Nether' is abundantly masterful. The set-design is simple yet bold and beautiful at the same time and the sound, video and lighting provide the transitions we needed to define both worlds represented onstage.


Its 80minute running time leaves its audience wanting, which is just how a play should leave it. When the lights came on, I was still captivated and it took me a while to leave my seat. It’s been a while since I was challenged in a similar way to ‘the nether’ and it’s a welcome break to find a playwright that writes with angst, with honesty and with foresight. I can’t wait to see Haley’s next works, don’t make it too long a wait!

Remember to head over here to discover more behind the concept and moral questions 'The Nether' provokes: http://watchinabitotheatrenstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-nerdy-nether.html